il y a une filière WBF sur les twin-switch avec par exemple ce genre de classements ici :
2 x sotm full options with 10 mhz ref clock
2 x sotm full options
er + sotm full options close to above
er + er very good
signle sotm full option
single ER
single sotm no options
on voit que la aussi certains aiment les classements discutables
et encore la plus loin dans la filière :
We were busy the whole night last night.
Here is the most important summary of the results :
1. ER is an over-achiever for sure. And it is better than all audiophile switches below or at around its price.
2. However there was no miracle. All attendees of the gathering, including me myself thought that the SOtM switch was still significantly better. This was not unexpected, because the SOtM was several times more expensive.
3. Single SOtM was better than a single ER (no matter unclocked or clocked).
4. For dual switch format, the sonic performance was SOtMx2 > SOtM to ER > ERx2 (no matter unclocked or clocked).
Actually we didn't like ERx2.
5. For the "SOtM to ER" config, connecting the two switches by optical fiber gave a mediocre and clinical sound. Using a Supra cat8 ethernet cable was better. Using a Vertere HB ethernet cable was much much better! Using optical fiber to connect two switches could give good sound only for SOtMx2.
6. Although Uptone claims that ER can be used with the included switching psu satisfactorily, we DON'T think so. Please give them a LPS.
bref, cela confirme l'intérêt de coupler deux switch.. mais pas n'importe lesquels ni n'importe comment !?
de mon côté, je confirme l'intérêt d'un double Meraki qui surpasse de loin un simple Meraki... bon, le budget a explosé de 90€ à 200€ (et ce sont toujours les alimentation Cisco d'origine..)
et ils parlent aussi de SFP ce que permet aussi le Meraki (et que je n'ai pas encore essayé..)
mon revendeur dans sa config de démo propose : router > fibre > SOtM > RJ45 > lecteur
je devrais lui parler de twin-switch pour faire exploser ses ventes
2 x sotm full options with 10 mhz ref clock
2 x sotm full options
er + sotm full options close to above
er + er very good
signle sotm full option
single ER
single sotm no options
on voit que la aussi certains aiment les classements discutables
et encore la plus loin dans la filière :
We were busy the whole night last night.
Here is the most important summary of the results :
1. ER is an over-achiever for sure. And it is better than all audiophile switches below or at around its price.
2. However there was no miracle. All attendees of the gathering, including me myself thought that the SOtM switch was still significantly better. This was not unexpected, because the SOtM was several times more expensive.
3. Single SOtM was better than a single ER (no matter unclocked or clocked).
4. For dual switch format, the sonic performance was SOtMx2 > SOtM to ER > ERx2 (no matter unclocked or clocked).
Actually we didn't like ERx2.
5. For the "SOtM to ER" config, connecting the two switches by optical fiber gave a mediocre and clinical sound. Using a Supra cat8 ethernet cable was better. Using a Vertere HB ethernet cable was much much better! Using optical fiber to connect two switches could give good sound only for SOtMx2.
6. Although Uptone claims that ER can be used with the included switching psu satisfactorily, we DON'T think so. Please give them a LPS.
bref, cela confirme l'intérêt de coupler deux switch.. mais pas n'importe lesquels ni n'importe comment !?
de mon côté, je confirme l'intérêt d'un double Meraki qui surpasse de loin un simple Meraki... bon, le budget a explosé de 90€ à 200€ (et ce sont toujours les alimentation Cisco d'origine..)
et ils parlent aussi de SFP ce que permet aussi le Meraki (et que je n'ai pas encore essayé..)
mon revendeur dans sa config de démo propose : router > fibre > SOtM > RJ45 > lecteur
je devrais lui parler de twin-switch pour faire exploser ses ventes