05-28-2018, 03:16 PM
(05-28-2018, 02:39 PM)renan a écrit :(05-28-2018, 02:17 PM)bz31 a écrit : Tout câble USB informatique respectant la norme USB est le meilleur. Si vous trouvez qu’un câble artisanal ou audiophile est mieux, c’est que soit vous préférez un son déformé soit votre DAC ou interface USB a un problème.
Attention tu es en train de virer subjectiviste
Si tu admets qu'un cable audiophile peut donner un son déformé alors que le signal est une suite de 0 et 1 c'est que tu justifies l'impact potentiel du cable
Tu dérapes Bz31, tu dérapes.....
Si je coupe un fil d'un câble, il ne préserve plus les "0" et "1".
L'impact d'un câble audiophile ? Je n'en sais rien. Peut-être il ajoute des erreurs pour plaire ?
Lu dans un lien donné par paulw dans un autre sujet :
Citation :As we compared USB cables, during one of our blind listening sessions, Jim Weil, creator of the RF mains conditioner we were using in my system came by and he participated briefly. We compared Rob's cheap USB cable that incorporated 2 built-in ferrites against Jay's personal reference -- the Danacable TruStream USB, my personal reference -- the Clarity Cables Natural USB, and a new cable Jay had received for review, the TotalDac USB Gigafilter. Because the price of cables is offensive to some on this thread, I will not list what these cables cost. To my ears, the differences amongst these cables were not subtle. The TotalDac had the most laid back presentation. It had a nice smooth romantic tone but at the expense of detail. This would help offset a bright or harsh system nicely but in my setup, I ranked it 3rd out of the 4 cables. The Danacables TruStream had slightly less warmth then the TotalDac, was a bit more incisive and portrayed better detail resolution. It had more air than the TotalDac and I ranked this cable 2nd best. It was no surprise that I found my Clarity Cables Natural USB to be my favorite USB cable and it is a cable I believe I could consistently pick out in a blind test. Having compared this USB cable against several dozen USB cables over the past couple of years, I have found that it speaks to me better than any USB cable I have yet heard. It presents the most air and space while also layering detail better than any cable I have compared it to and yet, despite it's detail resolution, I find no harshness at all with this cable. To my ears, it was also the most neutral sounding of all the cables. Despite Jay preferring the Danacable in his system, in my system, he also found the Clarity Cables Natural USB to sound the best. Jim Weil agreed with this sentiment as well. It was the collective opinion of these three (Jay, Jim, and myself) that Rob's cheap USB cable came in last place. Speaking only for myself, Rob's cheap USB cable sounded dull and flat and the least engaging of the lot. Rob's opinion was different from the group. He felt his cheap USB cable sounded best and "dull" is how things can sound in the absence of RF noise. He described my Clarity Cables Natural USB cable as an "RF noise generator" and he thought it sounded the worst of the lot.https://www.head-fi.org/threads/chord-el...t-14103674
Il me semble que le problème est l'absence de référence dans une écoute comparative pour juger la qualité fine d'un matériel.
Un matériel apportant un son qui vous plaît est-il vraiment un bon matériel ?